Christer
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
As of now, the latest blog entry display on coach pages will filter out unpopular blogs. In this context, unpopular means entries with rating less than 3 will be hidden. To avoid randomness, this only happens when an entry has 10 or more votes.
Blogs by friends are not affected by this filter. |
|
|
Woodstock
Joined: Dec 11, 2004
|
 Posted:
Mar 08, 2010 - 12:58 |
 
|
|
Grod
Joined: Sep 30, 2003
|
| Posted:
Mar 08, 2010 - 12:59 |
|
What on earth could have inspired this?  |
_________________
I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.
Oscar Wilde |
|
ultwe
Joined: Dec 25, 2004
|
| Posted:
Mar 08, 2010 - 13:04 |
|
\o/ |
_________________
Yeah, Nuffle sucks... That's because I play crap 
π is aproximately 3.142 times better than any other food |
|
Nachtogen
Joined: Jan 03, 2004
|
| Posted:
Mar 08, 2010 - 13:15 |
|
Hehe, some people won't be happy about this, but I like it |
_________________
Chaos was the law of nature; Order was the dream of man. |
|
Were_M_Eye
Joined: Sep 24, 2007
|
| Posted:
Mar 08, 2010 - 13:24 |
|
|
Nachtogen
Joined: Jan 03, 2004
|
| Posted:
Mar 08, 2010 - 13:26 |
|
If you click on more at the bottom of the blogs, you can still see them all... |
_________________
Chaos was the law of nature; Order was the dream of man. |
|
SeraphimRed
Joined: Feb 01, 2004
|
| Posted:
Mar 08, 2010 - 13:40 |
|
Shame to have to resort to this because of a couple of idiots. 
Some people disagree with blogs and rate them low but they're still worth reading, an inhibit option or even a filter value user-setting would be nicer imo (in the same manner of setting the number of blogs to display).
EDIT:: this might also encourage certain people to rate blogs low. |
_________________
Enhance YOUR FUMBBL
 |
|
Zombie69
Joined: Jul 02, 2007
|
| Posted:
Mar 08, 2010 - 16:43 |
|
Good idea Christer! You could have made the limit 2 instead of 3 though, since all his blogs are so bad that they fall under 2 anyway! |
|
|
Wolter
Joined: Dec 26, 2003
|
| Posted:
Mar 08, 2010 - 16:54 |
|
Great also apply the change too gamefinder...
if a coach has a sucky CR lets say 140 or less ? his teams should be hidden on gamefinder but friends are not affected by this filter.. |
|
|
Sionis
Joined: Aug 26, 2003
|
| Posted:
Mar 08, 2010 - 17:05 |
|
| Wolter wrote: | Great also apply the change too gamefinder...
if a coach has a sucky CR lets say 140 or less ? his teams should be hidden on gamefinder but friends are not affected by this filter.. |
Discriminating low 'CR' coaches is never a solution. Silly bloke.  |
|
|
MrMojo
Joined: Apr 17, 2004
|
| Posted:
Mar 08, 2010 - 18:37 |
|
| Sionis wrote: | | Wolter wrote: | Great also apply the change too gamefinder...
if a coach has a sucky CR lets say 140 or less ? his teams should be hidden on gamefinder but friends are not affected by this filter.. |
Discriminating low 'CR' coaches is never a solution. Silly bloke. |
Yeah, I wouldn't be able to cherrypick no more. |
_________________
My post count
Jesus loves me this I know, 'cos my Bible tells me so. |
|
Chrome_ghoul
Joined: May 31, 2008
|
| Posted:
Mar 08, 2010 - 19:09 |
|
I have mixed feelings about this one. Unpopular views should have the same chance to be heard as popular ones. That said, you can see all the unpopular blogs with just a couple of clicks more. |
|
|
Shraaaag
Joined: Feb 15, 2004
|
| Posted:
Mar 08, 2010 - 19:23 |
|
People rate blogs for different reasons.
I give low rating to poorly written blogs (or spammy), I don't rate blogs I have no interest in, and I give good rating to well-written blogs, even more if they are entertaining and/or interesting.
I like the new system, but it hasn't been a big problem reading blogs, until someone started spamming them. |
_________________
 |
|
Kelkka
Joined: Aug 14, 2009
|
| Posted:
Mar 08, 2010 - 20:29 |
|
How about putting a "report as spam" link to the blog?
And blog turns invisible if spam rating goes up enough (let's say 10 reports). |
|
|
|
|
All Star Bowl!!!
Search
