Roseph
Joined: Oct 19, 2006
|
  Posted:
Aug 28, 2011 - 21:51 |
|
tell us what you think. What would you like to see next issue |
|
|
Purplegoo
Joined: Mar 23, 2006
|
  Posted:
Aug 28, 2011 - 22:30 |
|
I think Clarkin's 'Star player - value for money?' analysis is superb. I'd like to see anything else he has on strategy and spending gold - clearly he has a knack if this article is anything to go by. |
|
|
Malmir
Joined: May 20, 2008
|
  Posted:
Aug 28, 2011 - 23:10 |
|
Really enjoyed the issue - thanks to all involved. Where do I vote for Painstate for contribution to the site for his major coverage? |
|
|
clarkin
Joined: Oct 15, 2007
|
  Posted:
Aug 29, 2011 - 00:17 |
|
Cheers Purplegoo! It's really just arithmetic though.. |
|
|
James_Probert
Joined: Nov 25, 2007
|
  Posted:
Aug 29, 2011 - 01:09 |
|
On the topic of feedback, I'd like to get in before anyone states the elephant in the room, and say that the unrevealed trophy for Best Contribution is that way on purpose, so don't worry about that. |
_________________
|
|
clarkin
Joined: Oct 15, 2007
|
  Posted:
Aug 29, 2011 - 12:16 |
|
I think the awards article should link to a nominations forum thread to get the ball rolling. Also the obituaries page (19) should be removed if (gasp!) no stars have died recently |
|
|
blocknroll
Joined: Aug 04, 2009
|
  Posted:
Aug 29, 2011 - 12:36 |
|
the bomber ask prinzka was SO funny, made me really laugh |
|
|
MrNomad
Joined: Mar 24, 2007
|
  Posted:
Aug 29, 2011 - 13:46 |
|
Love Purplegoo's article. Especially since this topic once again came up in main chat a few days ago. I always have hated the "balance" crowd. They are akin to elves to me |
|
|
maysrill
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
|
  Posted:
Aug 29, 2011 - 14:48 |
|
Purplegoo wrote: | I think Clarkin's 'Star player - value for money?' analysis is superb. I'd like to see anything else he has on strategy and spending gold - clearly he has a knack if this article is anything to go by. |
Comparative payback on the other inducements would be interesting to look into. Tougher to quantify the payback on a wizard or bribe, but if someone could manage something, that would be impressive. |
|
|
Purplegoo
Joined: Mar 23, 2006
|
  Posted:
Aug 29, 2011 - 15:09 |
|
MrNomad wrote: | Love Purplegoo's article. Especially since this topic once again came up in main chat a few days ago. I always have hated the "balance" crowd. They are akin to elves to me |
Any feedback gladly accepted - good or bad.
If I'm going to spend time writing stuff, it may as well be what people want! |
|
|
Corvidius
Joined: Feb 15, 2011
|
  Posted:
Aug 29, 2011 - 17:39 |
|
First time reading the GLN, particularly liked the angry man rant and Star analysis. |
|
|
Nelphine
Joined: Apr 01, 2011
|
  Posted:
Aug 30, 2011 - 07:46 |
|
clarkin wrote: | Also the obituaries page (19) should be removed if (gasp!) no stars have died recently |
Seeing this comment, I realize that there weren't any obituaries mentioned; so my question to the GLT staff is: Who WOULD qualify, given some of the players that have recently died (Plushy the Puppy Pulverizer? Dread Scott?) apparently didn't. I understand Brawn not qualifying, as he was just too short lived, but I'm interested to know what to look for on that page. |
|
|
SvenS
Joined: Jul 07, 2007
|
  Posted:
Aug 30, 2011 - 10:34 |
|
clarkin wrote: | I think the awards article should link to a nominations forum thread to get the ball rolling. |
seconded |
_________________ IL-S
SL |
|
clarkin
Joined: Oct 15, 2007
|
  Posted:
Aug 30, 2011 - 15:15 |
|
I've started a discussion thread for the TV of Stars article. Can you add a link to this at the bottom of the article? |
|
|
|