mrt1212

Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
  Posted:
Aug 28, 2017 - 19:41 |
|
There's no slippery slope. |
|
|
Sinnyil
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
|
  Posted:
Sep 10, 2017 - 23:27 |
|
Christer wrote: | ... That being said, the Stunty division is borderline dead with less than 10 matches played per day. As a direct consequence of it not having much interest from the coaches, the attention it gets from the staff (including me) is minimal. The Secret League project probably has more matches per day than Stunty at this point.
Without more interest in the division, I don't see much of anything happening with Stunty to be honest. To a point where I'm considering converting it into a L division league using the ruleset functions of the site. |
Oh secret league certainly has more matches per day. That's also because there's updates and communication regarding this league, and basically none for Stunty.
Stunty has languished without someone at the helm, which isn't surprising, it was always kind of niche in the past. The last major didn't even get a front page news thing, the rules are stuck in this weird hybrid of old and new, and nothing seems to be happening with the division at all. If the site treats the division as dead, why would any player act differently? There was always a small portion of the site that played, but since WB and Shadow went away, the number dwindled, and dwindled, and dwindled.
There was a small step in the right direction when a couple of people were appointed to oversee [S] tournaments, but that was a few months ago. No steps have been taken since then...and even by the activity on this forum you can see that there's been almost no communication since the appointments. What actually happened, a brawl gets scheduled every now and then? Nothing besides that, including any sort of communication on the brawls themselves.
I know Stunty isn't your bag C, and I can see why you'd consider pulling the plug on the division entirely. That is one of the two options I see for the division anyway. The other would be to put someone at it's helm who's motivated, communicative, and passionate about [S]. Barring that, yes, perhaps letting it finally die is the right thing to do. |
|
|
Bakunin

Joined: May 08, 2011
|
  Posted:
Oct 23, 2017 - 23:21 |
|
Christer wrote: | ... That being said, the Stunty division is borderline dead with less than 10 matches played per day. As a direct consequence of it not having much interest from the coaches, the attention it gets from the staff (including me) is minimal. The Secret League project probably has more matches per day than Stunty at this point.
Without more interest in the division, I don't see much of anything happening with Stunty to be honest. To a point where I'm considering converting it into a L division league using the ruleset functions of the site. |
Please for the love of all fumbbl, dont do that.
I'll gladly volunteer for being the helm of Stunty Leeg, if it stops the closing of Stunty Leeg.
Im between jobs right now, so I have more than enough time.
I do a lot of NAF table top organizing, even including a stunty leeg table top tourney.
I'll do my best for getting some hype to stunty leeg. |
|
|
garyt1

Joined: Mar 12, 2011
|
  Posted:
Oct 23, 2017 - 23:32 |
|
Closing Stunty Leeg would be absurd, without moving teams somewhere, with all the teams made for it. Putting it in league might work if that makes things easier. |
_________________ “A wise man can learn more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer.” |
|
Bakunin

Joined: May 08, 2011
|
  Posted:
Oct 23, 2017 - 23:36 |
|
garyt1 wrote: | Closing Stunty Leeg would be absurd, without moving teams somewhere, with all the teams made for it. Putting it in league might work if that makes things easier. |
What would make it easier other than making it even smaller? |
|
|
koadah

Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
  Posted:
Oct 23, 2017 - 23:38 |
|
|
thoralf
Joined: Mar 06, 2008
|
  Posted:
Oct 24, 2017 - 00:48 |
|
mrt1212 wrote: | There's no slippery slope. |
Who knows where it would go if there was. |
_________________ There is always Sneaky Git. |
|
PaddyMick

Joined: Jan 03, 2012
|
  Posted:
Oct 24, 2017 - 01:28 |
|
Yeah ogres got nerfed bad. PO for big guys only would have been the way to go.Also, after a game recently the money dice thing took my cash reserves below 140k - the price to replace an ogre. The rule of unintended consequences i guess. |
|
|
Motskari
Joined: Dec 03, 2005
|
  Posted:
Oct 24, 2017 - 01:52 |
|
Boohoo! There was times when majority of coaches were in favour of removing G access for stunty leeg big gyus. So sad! They were thinking that stunty would be much more stragetical play without bg:s killinng everythig. So sad again! Now that stunty is also without piling on, staregic couches shouls strive. Sad sad sad!
edit: too drunk |
|
|
Bakunin

Joined: May 08, 2011
|
  Posted:
Oct 24, 2017 - 12:50 |
|
koadah wrote: | If teams from different rulesets could play against each other the moving to [L]eague could be a plus.
Edit: Oops. I already said that.  |
Stunty leeg has its own meta and balance. Most times you would just get your ass kicked when playing other teams. |
|
|
koadah

Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
  Posted:
Oct 24, 2017 - 13:11 |
|
Bakunin wrote: | koadah wrote: | If teams from different rulesets could play against each other the moving to [L]eague could be a plus.
Edit: Oops. I already said that.  |
Stunty leeg has its own meta and balance. Most times you would just get your ass kicked when playing other teams. |
That would depend on who the other teams are. In the [L]eague division we can create all sorts of teams.
If people don't like a matchup they don't have to take it.
As it stands, teams can get stranded with no opponents. |
_________________
20 Year Anniversary! - 2016 Nostalgia Bowl - Weds 23rd April! -- All Star Bowl - Always recruiting! |
|
|