Grod

Joined: Sep 30, 2003
|
  Posted:
Apr 10, 2016 - 03:46 |
|
The other alternative is:
_ _ x x | x x x x x x x | x x _ _
_ _ _ _ | _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ | _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | _ _ _ _ |
_________________ I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.
Oscar Wilde |
|
JellyBelly

Joined: Jul 08, 2009
|
  Posted:
Apr 10, 2016 - 03:57 |
|
With that one, you could just blitz one of the guys nearer the middle from behind (around the side of the line). ST4+ players and lots of guard will certainly make it more difficult. |
_________________ "Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got them and they all stink." - The protagonist, Fallout 2
"Go for the eyes, Boo! Go for the eyes!!"  |
|
Seany18
Joined: Mar 12, 2016
|
  Posted:
Apr 10, 2016 - 11:44 |
|
x x _ _ | x x x x x x x | _ _ x x
_ _ _ _ | _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ | _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | _ _ _ _
What about that? I suppose you could blitz one of the edges of the Los on a 3+ and block the sideline players away but that's got to commit 2 of his players (obviously if he gives up he can surf your guys on the side which isn't ideal) and I guess a quick snap also completely screw you |
|
|
BillBrasky
Joined: Feb 15, 2005
|
  Posted:
Apr 10, 2016 - 12:09 |
|
3 ss and/or sf guys x . x. x should be cool. Put the rest 2 spaces from the endzone spread out. |
|
|
sann0638

Joined: Aug 09, 2010
|
  Posted:
Jul 23, 2023 - 18:53 |
|
Does this thread have a replacement now that Quick Snap is nerfed? |
_________________ NAF Ex-President
Founder of SAWBBL, Wiltshire's BB League on Facebook and Discord |
|