MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
  Posted:
Sep 30, 2024 - 12:01 |
|
Yes, no Block on Firesmiths is too much. The roster would have been ok with 6 default Block players, it has been overnerfed. |
|
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
  Posted:
Sep 30, 2024 - 12:04 |
|
MattDakka wrote: | Yes, no Block on Firesmiths is too much. The roster would have been ok with 6 default Block players, it has been overnerfed. |
Agreed. Also Firesmith should have Ironhard skin as they are the ones actually doing magic.... which is what causes the Stone Curse.. Such a weird choice. |
_________________
|
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
  Posted:
Sep 30, 2024 - 12:05 |
|
Very true about the Stone Curse, Astragoth Ironhand comes to mind. Firesmiths only should have Iron Hard Skin. |
|
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
  Posted:
Sep 30, 2024 - 12:12 |
|
I think saying the stone Curse is the reason for iron hard skin was the wrong thing to say.
They should've just said its because chaos dwarves wear Blackshard armour... that would be enough. |
_________________
|
|
Joost
Joined: Mar 17, 2014
|
  Posted:
Sep 30, 2024 - 14:32 |
|
Whoever priced stabbas has never played blood bowl. I don't see anyone picking them in a competitive game |
|
|
Zlefin
Joined: Apr 14, 2005
|
  Posted:
Oct 01, 2024 - 04:02 |
|
While the SPP cost is going to be too high for this to be generally useful, getting +av on the blockers is something I'd like to try at some point, for the sheer joy of a unit that's extremely hard to remove from the game and can't even be gangfouled (assuming I understand the new iron skin right), as well as for tuv efficiency. |
|
|
|
| |