Sp00keh
Joined: Dec 06, 2011
|
 Posted:
Dec 11, 2024 - 21:09 |
 
|
Big teams in previous ruleset meant 2500k+ killer clawpomb chaos or nurgle etc, those were awful to face
I'm glad those days are gone. Teams do need some upper restraint on them.
Currently [C] is less capped than the rules intended, so your teams can grow as big as you like
Whilst Christer has said redraft something like its either being developed or is basically ready, personally I don't think we'll see it in [C] in this ruleset
So a lot of your concerns are kind of just a boogieman? anyway I play the division as it is now, without much regard for what might happen in the future. there's no point worrying about that |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Dec 11, 2024 - 21:43 |
|
| Sp00keh wrote: | Big teams in previous ruleset meant 2500k+ killer clawpomb chaos or nurgle etc, those were awful to face
I'm glad those days are gone. Teams do need some upper restraint on them. |
Well, it depends who you ask. Like many things. 
I'd have called "big" around 1800-2300.
But CPOMB was silly even for 1200-1400 min/maxers.
| Sp00keh wrote: |
Currently [C] is less capped than the rules intended, so your teams can grow as big as you like
Whilst Christer has said redraft something like its either being developed or is basically ready, personally I don't think we'll see it in [C] in this ruleset |
Redraft already works in the [L]eague division. We're using it in 145. 
| Sp00keh wrote: |
So a lot of your concerns are kind of just a boogieman? anyway I play the division as it is now, without much regard for what might happen in the future. there's no point worrying about that |
Enjoy. |
_________________
Open [L]eague Tournaments - NOW recruiting!! Old/New style skill progression! - Secret League - All Stars! |
|
MerryZ
Joined: Nov 28, 2005
|
| Posted:
Dec 12, 2024 - 08:58 |
|
Where I play we do congratulate winners and scene is healthy.
Maybe you guys should look in mirror Instead of accusing other for not congratulating winners or making games intteresting.
Ps. You can apply rumbles twenty-four / seven !
Luv.
Merreh |
_________________
Kaptain Awasoam, Dicer of All Men and Women and Children and Puppies. |
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
| Posted:
Dec 12, 2024 - 12:43 |
|
| koadah wrote: |
Well, it depends who you ask. Like many things.
I'd have called "big" around 1800-2300.
|
I see. By the way, current TV 1500 is like old TV 1600 with 10 Fan Factor. I mean, current 1500 is not that low and it's viable right now in the Box. It's not 1800-2300, sure, but relatively enjoyable and fun (and as you know, I'm a critical guy, so if I say it that should mean something). I think it's better to play BB at 1500 than not to play it at all. It's not the ideal TV range you would love to play at, I understand that, but it's better than nothing. Anyway, I have teams up to 1875 TV and I play regularly in the Box. If you wanted to build a big team we could play, although it's not my favoured TV. It's just to say that high TV matches are possible to play, if you really want.
| koadah wrote: |
But CPOMB was silly even for 1200-1400 min/maxers. |
Yes, but with rookie protection that would not have been a problem. Now the Box has a max TV gap of 350, that's a huge improvement. The old Box had no TV gap cap, you could find games with a 1170 TV gap. Moreover, now the Box requires only 2 coaches to arrange a game. |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Dec 12, 2024 - 17:11 |
|
| MattDakka wrote: | | koadah wrote: |
Well, it depends who you ask. Like many things.
I'd have called "big" around 1800-2300.
|
I see. By the way, current TV 1500 is like old TV 1600 with 10 Fan Factor. I mean, current 1500 is not that low and it's viable right now in the Box. It's not 1800-2300, sure, but relatively enjoyable and fun (and as you know, I'm a critical guy, so if I say it that should mean something). I think it's better to play BB at 1500 than not to play it at all. It's not the ideal TV range you would love to play at, I understand that, but it's better than nothing. Anyway, I have teams up to 1875 TV and I play regularly in the Box. If you wanted to build a big team we could play, although it's not my favoured TV. It's just to say that high TV matches are possible to play, if you really want.
|
Well, if seasons are really not coming... 
Jus kidding.
I still think that an experienced team BBT would be good. |
_________________
Open [L]eague Tournaments - NOW recruiting!! Old/New style skill progression! - Secret League - All Stars! |
|
Sp00keh
Joined: Dec 06, 2011
|
| Posted:
Dec 12, 2024 - 17:49 |
|
Mmm... I mean there is brawls and minors for that |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Dec 12, 2024 - 17:59 |
|
|
Sp00keh
Joined: Dec 06, 2011
|
| Posted:
Dec 12, 2024 - 18:04 |
|
No, for [C] teams who are over 15 games but want to play in events (without waiting for the majors calendar) |
|
|
spinball
Joined: Jul 01, 2004
|
| Posted:
Dec 12, 2024 - 21:08 |
|
Honestly I would question everything when it comes to me winning a major. The fact that team has was 2 this year would make the questions more prevalent as well!
My 2 cents: vampires at certain levels are just so difficult to defend against. Just like underworld at lower tvs before they lost swarming, vampires and higher TV are just really difficult to deal with. Hypnotic gaze needs dealt with in one shape or form.
Either
Increase the requirements for it to work. 2+ for most attempts is silly.
Or
Don't turn off skills unless you roll a 6. Instead just lose tackle zones. Still powerful but not as bad.
I have also heard a suggestion for if gaze works it turns off one skill. So you gaze a war dancer you could choose block or dodge but not both. The argument was at lower TV vamps aren't as much a problem but they are at high TV. If you have to choose which skill to nullify higher TV matches aren't as frustrating potentially. |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fumbbl Cup - Are you...
Search
