Tripleskull
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
|
 Posted:
Jan 07, 2025 - 08:24 |
 
|
It would be very nice if using dp could be made optional, would that be feasible?
Best regards
Nicolai |
|
|
Solaris
Joined: May 29, 2023
|
| Posted:
Jan 07, 2025 - 09:02 |
|
I would appreciate this |
_________________
 |
|
JanMattys
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jan 07, 2025 - 09:24 |
|
Is there any reason I can't think of for choosing not to use the skill? You have literally no disadvantage for using it.
Uhm. Maybe you need to break armor, but you don't want the player out because you need the square occupied? |
_________________
 |
|
Joost
Joined: Mar 17, 2014
|
| Posted:
Jan 07, 2025 - 10:00 |
|
Especially with DP+2 you might not use it to break armour and risk a sent off for an unmodified injury roll. Especially if you have sneaky git. |
|
|
MerryZ
Joined: Nov 28, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jan 07, 2025 - 10:18 |
|
As a Finnish person, I cant see any reason for not using a dirty player. |
_________________
Kaptain Awasoam, Dicer of All Men and Women and Children and Puppies. |
|
Sp00keh
Joined: Dec 06, 2011
|
| Posted:
Jan 07, 2025 - 10:22 |
|
| Joost wrote: | | Especially with DP+2 you might not use it to break armour and risk a sent off for an unmodified injury roll. Especially if you have sneaky git. |
If you don't want that risk, just don't foul |
|
|
C0ddlefish
Joined: Sep 17, 2019
|
| Posted:
Jan 07, 2025 - 10:24 |
|
Presumably it's on the list of 'skills that are technically optional but we don't want a pop-up every single time we use it' |
|
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
| Posted:
Jan 07, 2025 - 11:54 |
|
If we don't want a pop-up every single time we use it then make it optional.
People who are not bothered by such pop-up can enable it, people not liking the pop-up can disable it. |
|
|
Tripleskull
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jan 07, 2025 - 11:56 |
|
| JanMattys wrote: | Is there any reason I can't think of for choosing not to use the skill? You have literally no disadvantage for using it.
Uhm. Maybe you need to break armor, but you don't want the player out because you need the square occupied? |
I am talking about not using it on the AV roll.
Only risking the ejection when you have DP on the Inj roll is significant, particularly for the likes of a Death Rollers and Lord Borak, but also for regular Dirty players. |
|
|
fxiii
Joined: Oct 30, 2012
|
| Posted:
Jan 07, 2025 - 12:40 |
|
same thing for Mighty blow though, sometimes you just want a square filled with a prone player and wont use MB if you have the choice... but yeah that'd be a lot of popups  |
|
|
Joost
Joined: Mar 17, 2014
|
| Posted:
Jan 07, 2025 - 13:08 |
|
| Sp00keh wrote: | | Joost wrote: | | Especially with DP+2 you might not use it to break armour and risk a sent off for an unmodified injury roll. Especially if you have sneaky git. |
If you don't want that risk, just don't foul |
I don't mind this not being implemented in the client at all, but this is a reason why one would want it implemented. Especially with someone like Borak I would certainly opt out early on of any foul where I would need to apply the +2 on an armour roll. |
|
|
Tripleskull
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jan 07, 2025 - 16:22 |
|
| fxiii wrote: | | same thing for Mighty blow though, sometimes you just want a square filled with a prone player and wont use MB if you have the choice... but yeah that'd be a lot of popups |
This reason is very marginal, an I would say not worth it. The DP case is quite different. In any case I think it should be optional to get the pop ups like with a number of other skills. |
|
|
|
|
Replays - Steel Gaun...
Search
