SideshowBob
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07a31/07a310fe4bcb8971aee441ea947e80a7c2bfa1ee" alt=""
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
  Posted:
Feb 26, 2025 - 21:36 |
|
StrangeFeller wrote: | I am pleased to report that we have our first recruit! Judah Astar is to my knowledge the first ever Chaos Renegade rotter. Now go forth and multiply.
match link: https://fumbbl.com/p/match?id=4608904
Number of Nurgle's Rot fouls: 1
Number of Nurgle's Rot blocks: 11
notes: One foul, one kill. All glory to Guffle.
points: 62 |
Amazing achievement! |
|
|
ThierryM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40678/4067817deb4cb724b66b5abe6462a07a69e3bdd9" alt=""
Joined: Mar 27, 2015
|
  Posted:
Feb 27, 2025 - 15:17 |
|
Grats !
... Damned Apo... |
_________________ Breeder of Bony Legends !
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6caae/6caaefed0e09ddc5424dd7a7154dee6c7e5ad6dc" alt="Image Image" |
|
StrangeFeller
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9bfa/b9bfabdcb7ea2474cda7d9b366a7ff5d4a155dfd" alt=""
Joined: May 13, 2023
|
  Posted:
Feb 27, 2025 - 19:16 |
|
Thanks! I saw your message on the previous page. Stupid apo indeed.. so close!
Sadly things have not progressed as smoothly since the first game. Second game we scored no kills, and third game was against gnomes, so ineligible.
Game 2:
match link: https://fumbbl.com/p/match?id=4609105
Number of Nurgle's Rot fouls: 0
Number of Nurgle's Rot blocks: 12 (Guffle 2, rotter 10)
notes: Guffle killed by a hobgoblin both down on turn 3. Hobgoblin armour wasn't broken..
points: 12
Game 3:
match link: https://fumbbl.com/p/match?id=4609134
Number of Nurgle's Rot fouls: n/a
Number of Nurgle's Rot blocks: n/a
notes: Blackbox is a bad idea. Too many stunties about if you're <1000 TV.
points: 0
I think I'll go back to accepting gamefinder offers from people looking for an easy target. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/903c5/903c5a4bcdcfce78de42cf2e5a9b8ac12d0c88cc" alt="Smile" |
|
|
StrangeFeller
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9bfa/b9bfabdcb7ea2474cda7d9b366a7ff5d4a155dfd" alt=""
Joined: May 13, 2023
|
  Posted:
Feb 27, 2025 - 21:46 |
|
And we have another one!! This time it was the old rotter who did the deed, which means we have a second-generation rotter on the team! I am drafting up a family tree as we speak.
Game 4:
match link: https://fumbbl.com/p/match?id=4609153
Number of Nurgle's Rot fouls: 1
Number of Nurgle's Rot blocks: 9 (Guffle 2, rotter 7)
notes: Guffle sent off on the first foul, for a stun.
points: 10
Game 5:
match link: https://fumbbl.com/p/match?id=4609171
Number of Nurgle's Rot fouls: 4
Number of Nurgle's Rot blocks: 10 (Guffle 6, rotter 4)
notes: Orc lino killed by a rotter gangfoul. Then got a touchdown for his trouble.
points: 14 + ???
This game had both the second rotter created, and a rotter created by another rotter. Does this count for both bonuses, or only one? |
|
|
spelledaren
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fa0e/7fa0e158cb71bf9e1f098620051fd8d55f311df9" alt=""
Joined: Mar 06, 2004
|
  Posted:
Feb 27, 2025 - 22:38 |
|
Great work! |
_________________ FUMBBL! |
|
Java
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12495/124951864184a7f6d799833e9524c7502e7e3ede" alt=""
Joined: Jan 27, 2018
|
  Posted:
Feb 28, 2025 - 06:34 |
|
Only the "rotter created by another rotter" bonus applies
Outstanding work!! |
_________________ Vlad Von Carstein's door-to-door evangelist |
|
WaffleIron
Joined: Oct 11, 2023
|
  Posted:
Mar 01, 2025 - 17:46 |
|
Game 1:
match link: https://fumbbl.com/FUMBBL.php?page=match&id=4609549
Number of Nurgle's Rot fouls: 1
Number of Nurgle's Rot blocks: 3
notes: Guffles goats inaugural game is extremely low scoring with our opponent conceding after dropping the ball on t8 and the goats managing to dodge, pickup in rain, double rush, 8+ longbomb, fail intefere, 5+ catch, and dodge to score.
Lesson learned, scoring TDs is bad for scoring Guffle points
points: 4 |
|
|
WaffleIron
Joined: Oct 11, 2023
|
  Posted:
Mar 01, 2025 - 19:44 |
|
Game 2:
match link: https://fumbbl.com/FUMBBL.php?page=match&id=4609578
Number of Nurgle's Rot fouls: n/a
Number of Nurgle's Rot blocks: n/a
notes: Box game, got gnomes, clearly gonna have to stick to game finder until 1st rotter when we can bloat our TV up
points: 0 |
|
|
Sp00keh
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/211c3/211c3b620b681cf96d731e6634ad15a61e052343" alt=""
Joined: Dec 06, 2011
|
  Posted:
Mar 01, 2025 - 20:44 |
|
I think box scheduler will match teams below 1000k, as if they are 1000k, doesn’t it?
So most of the time you would be ok |
|
|
WaffleIron
Joined: Oct 11, 2023
|
  Posted:
Mar 01, 2025 - 22:43 |
|
Game 3:
match link: https://fumbbl.com/FUMBBL.php?page=match&id=4609618
Number of Nurgle's Rot fouls: 2
Number of Nurgle's Rot blocks: 13
notes: Gamefinder vs jnewmans skaven, very nearly the max number of blocks/fouls by guffle but we were robbed by a quad skull on T14, guffle managed 1 cas by block and 1 by foul on t16 which got him ejected.
points: 15 |
|
|
Lewdgrip
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e602/6e602848894c750f994ead1b4b836c0041892793" alt=""
Joined: Feb 06, 2005
|
  Posted:
Mar 01, 2025 - 23:37 |
|
First match with "Chaos for Guffle"
Game 1:
match link: https://fumbbl.com/p/match?id=4609637
Number of Nurgle's Rot fouls: 0
Number of Nurgle's Rot blocks: 6
notes: Guffle scored first touchdown and resisted to get surfed twice with both/down
points: 6 |
Last edited by Lewdgrip on Mar 02, 2025; edited 3 times in total |
|
StrangeFeller
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9bfa/b9bfabdcb7ea2474cda7d9b366a7ff5d4a155dfd" alt=""
Joined: May 13, 2023
|
  Posted:
Mar 02, 2025 - 00:13 |
|
Sp00keh wrote: | I think box scheduler will match teams below 1000k, as if they are 1000k, doesn’t it?
So most of the time you would be ok |
It's very possible that I've been unlucky, but in my experience, no it doesn't. I checked, and the last 5 games I played in blackbox with a TV of more than 50k below 1000 were all against stunties. I believe the algorithm still matches for smallest TV difference even below 1000.
Personally I'm not a fan, as I don't think stunties particularly want to face other stunties, while proper teams won't mind a stunty opponent at all. Our Guffle teams suffer doubly, as stunty matchups are functionally worthless to us even if we do get the cash to induce him (which we usually won't).
But hey, we're playing a silly metagame here. Can't expect the system to cater to our needs. I do feel for the stunty coaches though.. |
|
|
Sp00keh
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/211c3/211c3b620b681cf96d731e6634ad15a61e052343" alt=""
Joined: Dec 06, 2011
|
  Posted:
Mar 02, 2025 - 01:40 |
|
No I mean, it will still attempt to match by TV, so if you're 800k and there's someone else 810k, it'll pair you
But if there's no one else under 1000k, then you get treated like you're at 1000k
It was specifically done for the stunties, also for the teams who get smashed so low that they can't find matches and then can never recover |
|
|
Lewdgrip
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e602/6e602848894c750f994ead1b4b836c0041892793" alt=""
Joined: Feb 06, 2005
|
  Posted:
Mar 02, 2025 - 20:33 |
|
|
|