37 coaches online • Server time: 15:48
* * * Did you know? The fouliest player is Bruce Wayne XVII with 2010 fouls.
Recent Forum Topics  12-game Season | Running fumbbl clien... | Keeping vs rehire |
Match Result · Ranked division
Match recorded on 2009-08-22 17:47:02
30k
1/0/0
Player Performances
td
comp
cas
int
mvp
spp
turns
pass
rush
block
foul
TOTALS
1
-
1
-
1
10
-
-
13
19
1
Player Performances
td
comp
cas
int
mvp
spp
turns
pass
rush
block
foul
TOTALS
2
-
1
-
1
13
-
-
25
56
6
“You keep editing the match report (edited 8 times) to make yourself look good.
Basically ignoring, misrepresenting or wilfully misunderstanding my comments.
I fouled 6 times, tactically to win the game. The reason I did this was to win the game. Thats the reason this "more experienced" coach fouled you 6 times.
Do you see thats how I won. I made sure I had more players on the pitch and controlled the game from middle of first half.
As for being more talkative I really don't understand why you think I wasn't.
As I did spend a little while explaining why I was fouling during the game after you were whining that the fouls were unnecessary. I also (where appropriate) replied to your comments during the game.
As for your new disclaimer at the start of your match report.
How can you understand that "fouling is a part of BB" but then complain about my fouling you 6 times?
As for me having the better team...
When you have a little more experience you will realise that rotters are a joke race whereas darkelves are pretty good at winning. there was 3 ts difference between the teams. but you had 2 frenzy blodgers and i had no tacklers or rotters just beastmen and a BoN.
Anyhow I didn't want this to get acrimonious I just wanted to point out a few things. You ever want a replay you let me know.
I'll even let you have rotters next time and i'll take darkelves and show you how to play them.
Best of luck
Ken.
”
Basically ignoring, misrepresenting or wilfully misunderstanding my comments.
I fouled 6 times, tactically to win the game. The reason I did this was to win the game. Thats the reason this "more experienced" coach fouled you 6 times.
Do you see thats how I won. I made sure I had more players on the pitch and controlled the game from middle of first half.
As for being more talkative I really don't understand why you think I wasn't.
As I did spend a little while explaining why I was fouling during the game after you were whining that the fouls were unnecessary. I also (where appropriate) replied to your comments during the game.
As for your new disclaimer at the start of your match report.
How can you understand that "fouling is a part of BB" but then complain about my fouling you 6 times?
As for me having the better team...
When you have a little more experience you will realise that rotters are a joke race whereas darkelves are pretty good at winning. there was 3 ts difference between the teams. but you had 2 frenzy blodgers and i had no tacklers or rotters just beastmen and a BoN.
Anyhow I didn't want this to get acrimonious I just wanted to point out a few things. You ever want a replay you let me know.
I'll even let you have rotters next time and i'll take darkelves and show you how to play them.
Best of luck
Ken.
”
Had you been a bit more talkative, that would have made the experience entertaining...
Thanks for the game anyway.
-----
second if you had chatted i would have replied. in fact i did reply to every comment you made and even explained why i was fouling.
-----
You might have thought about replying to my comments, but you didn't. Sorry mate, not even half te time.
-----
third you asked for the game and to be honest the odds were on your side with 2 blodgers and me with no tacklers.
-----
I did indeed but as far as I remember both your TR and TS were higher than mine, you might want to take this into account when you mention odds.
-----
fifth calling me on being quiet is a little rich since you didn't say anything at the end of the game just vanished. especially after i not only thanked you for the game but also wished you well in future games and again explained why i fouled.
----
Funny oh I remember saluting you on my way out, speaking about glass, you might want to find yourself a pair of spectacles. Granted it was a short "Cya around" but I didn't just vanish and I thanked you for the game in my comment here as it would have been rude not to.
Did I want to stay any longer to chat with you? No, as I said, you were not talkative (except when trying to justify fouling a player who is no threat (not even potential) to the ball carrier), so there was no point.
----
I think maybe you maybe live in a glasshouse and shouldn't throw stones.
----
I don't remember commenting on your being (this is usually used by kids who have no arguments, c'mon man, you're worth more than that), BTW, read the first 5 words of my comment.
Anyway, good luck to you mate, next time I'll come back with more experience (as a coach) and won't let a damn cage around the ball carrier :P
Make myself look good? Lol, to whom shall I try to make myself look good? Who is going to read this match report aside form you and me? It's not as if it was the finale of a tournament.
Now for the "more experiences" coach, you have played almost 1300 games, I have about 10, guess this qualifies for more experienced coach, doesn't it? I think you misunderstood me: I didn't whine about fouling as it's part of the game (didn't I start my comment by this?), I was just expecting to see some more advanced strategy from a more advanced player. At a point in the game you had more than 11 players when I had 5 (1 BH + 5 KO), why not just score and go for a 3rd TD? See what I mean?
As to replay with you, well, as long as you are more talkative I don't mind. I just can't play a match with the other one not chatting (you know, chatting as in "not only trying to justify or explain his actions"), ask the other coaches I played with, they'll tell you.”