70 coaches online • Server time: 21:27
* * * Did you know? The number of matches played is 3042796.
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post Gnomes are trashgoto Post Fumbbl Cup - Replaysgoto Post Mega-Stars never wen...
Creationism
Retired [X2] Elf

<body>

<p><font size="5">Creationism</font><br>
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<br>
<br>
<i>"Creationism" can also refer to creation myths in general, or to a concept about the origin of the soul. </i><br>
<br>
Creationism is the religious belief that humanity, life, the Earth, and the universe were created in their original form by a deity (often the Abrahamic God of Judaism, Christianity and Islam) or deities.[1] In relation to the creation-evolution controversy the term creationism is commonly used to refer to religiously motivated rejection of evolution as an explanation of origins.[2]<br>
<br>
Such beliefs include young Earth creationism, proponents of which believe that the earth is thousands rather than billions of years old. They typically believe the days in Genesis Chapter 1 are 24 hours in length, while Old Earth creationism accepts geological findings and other methods of dating the earth and believes that these findings do not contradict the Genesis account, but reject evolution. The term theistic evolution has been coined to refer to beliefs in creation which are more compatible with the scientific view of evolution and the age of the Earth. Alternately, there are other religious people who support creation, but in terms of allegorical interpretations of Genesis.<br>
<br>
Creationism in the West is usually based on creation according to Genesis, and in its broad sense covers a wide range of beliefs and interpretations. Through the 19th century the term most commonly referred to direct creation of individual souls, in contrast to traducianism. However, by 1929 in the United States the term became particularly associated with Christian fundamentalist opposition to human evolution and belief in a young Earth.[2] Several U.S. states passed laws against the teaching of evolution in public schools, as upheld in the Scopes Trial. Evolution was omitted entirely from school textbooks in much of the United States until the 1960s. Since then, renewed efforts to introduce teaching creationism in American public schools in the form of flood geology, creation science, and intelligent design have been consistently held to contravene the constitutional separation of Church and State by a succession of legal judgments.[3] The meaning of the term creationism was contested, but by the 1980s it had been co-opted by proponents of creation science and flood geology.[2]<br>
<br>
When mainstream scientific research produces conclusions which contradict a creationist interpretation of scripture, the strict creationist approach is either to reject the conclusions of the research,[4] its underlying scientific theories,[5] and/or its methodology.[6] For this reason,
<b> both creation science and intelligent design have been labeled as pseudoscience</b> by the mainstream scientific community.[7] The most notable disputes concern the effects of evolution on the development of living organisms, the idea of common descent, the geologic history of the Earth, the formation of the solar system, and the origin of the universe.[8][9][10][11]<br>
<br>
NOTES:<br>
^ Hayward 1998, p. 11&nbsp;<br>
^ a b c Ronald L. Numbers. "Antievolutionists and Creationists". Creationism History. Counterbalance Meta-Library. Retrieved on 2007-08-15.&nbsp;<br>
^ a b c d e Creationism/ID, A Short Legal History By Lenny Flank, Talk Reason&nbsp;<br>
^ Williams, A.R. (1995). "Flaws in dating the earth as ancient". Creation 18: 14. http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v18/i1/earth.asp. Retrieved on 10 November 2008.&nbsp;<br>
^ Truman, R. (2003). "Protein mutational context dependence: a challenge to neo-Darwinian theory: part 1" (PDF). Journal of Creation 17: 117–127. http://www.creationontheweb.com/images/pdfs/tj/v17n1_proteins.pdf. Retrieved on 10 November 2008.&nbsp;<br>
^ Batten, R. (2002-02-28). "It's not science". Creation Ministries International. Retrieved on 2008-11-10.&nbsp;<br>
^ "Statements from Scientific and Scholarly Organizations". National Center for Science Education. Retrieved on 2008-08-28.&nbsp;<br>
^ Royal Society statement on evolution, creationism and intelligent design&nbsp;<br>
^ National Association of Biology Teachers Statement on Teaching Evolution&nbsp;<br>
^ IAP Statement on the Teaching of Evolution Joint statement issued by the national science academies of 67 countries, including the United Kingdom's Royal Society (PDF file)&nbsp;<br>
^ From the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the world's largest general scientific society: 2006 Statement on the Teaching of EvolutionPDF (44.8 KB), AAAS Denounces Anti-Evolution Laws
<br>
</p>

</body>

</html>
New Team Page Beta
Player Ma St Ag Av Skills Inj G Cp Td It Cs Mvp SPP Cost  
1
both creation science
Lineman
6 3 4 7   1 0 1 0 0 0 3/ 60k
(50)k
  
2
and intelligent design
Lineman
6 3 4 7 m 2 0 0 0 0 1 5/ 60k
(0)k
  
3
have been labeled
Lineman
6 3 4 7   2 1 0 0 0 0 1/ 60k
(50)k
  
4
as pseudoscience
Lineman
6 3 4 7   2 1 0 0 0 0 1/ 60k
(50)k
  
5
It is a joke
Lineman
6 3 4 7 n 1 0 0 0 0 0 0/ 60k
(42)k
  
6
to spend time
Lineman
5 3 4 7 -ma 1 0 0 0 0 0 0/ 60k
(40)k
  
7
believing such
Lineman
6 3 4 7
Block
 n, m 2 1 0 0 0 1 6/ 80k
(0)k
  
9
and basically a
Lineman
6 3 4 7 m 2 1 0 0 0 0 1/ 60k
(0)k
  
10
disgrace to
Lineman
6 3 4 7   2 1 0 0 0 0 1/ 60k
(50)k
  
6 players (+3 players missing next game)  
Coach: Nicodemus1 Re-Rolls (100k): 4  
Race: Elf Fan Factor: 9  
Current Team Value: 0k Assistant Coaches: 0  
Treasury: 70k Cheerleaders: 0  
Team Value: 700k Apothecary: Yes  

Games Played:2 (1/0/1) |TD Diff:-1 (3 - 4) |Cas Diff:-10 (0/0/0 - 2/5/3)
Last Opponent: Never Evolved