Posted by Zombie69 on 2009-03-19 20:27:03
LRB5 sucks, so voted 1.
Posted by SillySod on 2009-03-19 21:30:03
You can already do this in the LRB5 division. Of course thats a big failure because it tries to combine two rulebooks where they shouldnt be combined.
Posted by Chrome_ghoul on 2009-03-19 22:39:24
There is a lot of hullabaloo about an LRB5 client in the forum right now, perhaps this would be of interest to you.
FUMBBL, for better or worse, is still tied to Skijunkie's great LRB4 client.
Although this my change in the future, I would not hold my breath.
Posted by Pirog on 2009-03-20 00:04:58
If an LRB5 client is to be implemented I hope that Christer will start a new LRB5 division from scratch so that everyone has an equal opportunity.
Personally I would still enjoy playing with LRB4 at times. There is room for both rule sets on Fumbbl.
Posted by MightyQuinn on 2009-03-20 00:12:21
I know we have lrb5, but I thought the team rosters for lrb5 could be used for lrb4
Posted by SillySod on 2009-03-20 01:00:50
... but why would you want that? The rosters are all balanced for LRB5 rather than LRB4. How would you implement the Dark Elf roster for example?
Posted by pythrr on 2009-03-20 05:43:44
I would like a life size chocolate model of Beyonce.
Posted by Cloggy on 2009-03-20 08:48:18
I would love LRB5 in Fumbbl, provided there is a possibility to rset teams to 100 TV without losing teir history and match record.
I don't see a reason to implement it gradually though. Just wait for the client to be finished and then play LRB5 in a full LRB5 environment.