17 coaches online • Server time: 03:23
* * * Did you know? The player with the strongest arm is Cherrystone Hotpack with 5758 yards passed.
Recent Forum Topics  DIBBL Awards | ogres are awesome 1-... | S2 of PEBBL |
2022-06-28 17:22:09
12 votes, rating 1.6
12 votes, rating 1.6
Bye guys
Goodbye fumbbl, until you do a review of the dice, I think I'll stop playing for these places, it's absolutely absurd and ridiculous, as all games can be so unequal, I tried to use this as training, but it's not even good for this.
Comments
Posted by mekutata on 2022-06-28 17:53:09
Bye
Posted by awambawamb on 2022-06-28 18:27:51
Farewell
Posted by misterlonestar on 2022-06-28 18:51:41
over the years of playing here I've learned that bad dice and poor coaching go hand in hand. one game can be decided by dice, maybe two, but if you feel like a trend is developing, check yourself.
Posted by Dynamix on 2022-06-28 19:05:20
If we take it as read without argument that there is something wrong with the dice/RNG. Would it not affect everyone?
Posted by C0ddlefish on 2022-06-28 19:18:55
No, just look at the matches where there's a written report about how bad the dice are. It purely coincidental that they all happen to be draws and loses
Posted by csk73 on 2022-06-29 00:09:15
Posted by asitaka on 2022-06-29 00:44:16
Of course, it is only a criterion when I lose or draw, it has nothing to do with my last 20 games in which I have not played any match.
I'm sure I'm a bad coach and getting hurt by an average of 4 armor 10+ players per game has a lot to do with how badly I place, I guess my average 74% WR in backbox or my average 77% overall indicates how bad it is coach that I should be, in addition to being among the top 15 coaches in the NAF. What do I know about blood bowl!
I'm just a bad trainer with a lousy winning percentage who complains that I only lose because of bad dice!
By the way, as much as you talk, you can see the repetition of the matches I complain about, which are not only lost, but also matches won with 8 dead dwarves.
This bad trainer says goodbye to this amazing blood bowl website.
I'm sure I'm a bad coach and getting hurt by an average of 4 armor 10+ players per game has a lot to do with how badly I place, I guess my average 74% WR in backbox or my average 77% overall indicates how bad it is coach that I should be, in addition to being among the top 15 coaches in the NAF. What do I know about blood bowl!
I'm just a bad trainer with a lousy winning percentage who complains that I only lose because of bad dice!
By the way, as much as you talk, you can see the repetition of the matches I complain about, which are not only lost, but also matches won with 8 dead dwarves.
This bad trainer says goodbye to this amazing blood bowl website.
Posted by Rawlf on 2022-06-29 10:54:44
Asitaka, you are obviously a very strong coach. The site ranks you #4 highest overall CR.
It is highly unlikely that you run into a coach who can outplay you and give you a "deserved" loss. At this point, I would say that nobody can completely outplay you.
So if your winrate is 77%, you lose or tie 23% of your games. And if it isn't because of the coaching, what can be the reason you don't win? Bad dice of course! I am not being sarcastic or anything, the reason is probably indeed that you had bad dice (or your oppo was really lucky, same thing).
But these things happen, they have to. Just like quad skulls are very unlikely, they do happen. One time in 1296. If they never happened, this would not be a game of chance.
You can lose in poker because your oppo finds the ace he needs on the river. You can lose in yatzee because your oppo slams down five of a kind in one go. And you can lose in BB because your av 10+ team eats several early CAS.
Events like this are the only reason your win% is at 77 and not 100. Or well, 99.9%, there are 3 stronger coaches out there, going by CR.
I find it amazing that you can be such a good coach at this risk-management game without understanding how outlier odds have to happen in a game of chance according to their likelihood.
IMHO, you have room to improve as a coach here. Don't allow yourself to tilt over things you cannot control, like the dice results. Do not use the cheap excuse by blaming the RNG. The RNG is really good here. It is explained in the help section if you are interested in a more scientific explanation.
https://fumbbl.com/help:FFB_RNG
It is highly unlikely that you run into a coach who can outplay you and give you a "deserved" loss. At this point, I would say that nobody can completely outplay you.
So if your winrate is 77%, you lose or tie 23% of your games. And if it isn't because of the coaching, what can be the reason you don't win? Bad dice of course! I am not being sarcastic or anything, the reason is probably indeed that you had bad dice (or your oppo was really lucky, same thing).
But these things happen, they have to. Just like quad skulls are very unlikely, they do happen. One time in 1296. If they never happened, this would not be a game of chance.
You can lose in poker because your oppo finds the ace he needs on the river. You can lose in yatzee because your oppo slams down five of a kind in one go. And you can lose in BB because your av 10+ team eats several early CAS.
Events like this are the only reason your win% is at 77 and not 100. Or well, 99.9%, there are 3 stronger coaches out there, going by CR.
I find it amazing that you can be such a good coach at this risk-management game without understanding how outlier odds have to happen in a game of chance according to their likelihood.
IMHO, you have room to improve as a coach here. Don't allow yourself to tilt over things you cannot control, like the dice results. Do not use the cheap excuse by blaming the RNG. The RNG is really good here. It is explained in the help section if you are interested in a more scientific explanation.
https://fumbbl.com/help:FFB_RNG
Posted by asitaka on 2022-06-29 16:45:18
I appreciate your message, understanding my frustration, without being ironic or offensive, thank you.
I understand the probabilities, and I try to study them in each game, but generally the games tend to have too extreme dice, few close matches are seen here.
I will try to follow your appreciated comment
Thanks Rawlf
I understand the probabilities, and I try to study them in each game, but generally the games tend to have too extreme dice, few close matches are seen here.
I will try to follow your appreciated comment
Thanks Rawlf