Posted by Woodstock on 2012-06-28 20:55:13
You do know the RNG that is used here on FUMBBL is better then any dice out there in the real world?
Also... your sample size is way too small if you want to prove a point.
Posted by Purplegoo on 2012-06-28 21:01:54
Some, well, infact most of my worst ever luck has been with real dice.
I should start demanding an RNG. :)
Posted by Emeric on 2012-06-28 21:22:58
In my current tabletop league a wood elf coach got +ST on his WD on first match (one cas + MVP of course). 2nd match +AG on a catcher.
After 4 matches he had won 240k (yes, that's many fame and win/tie bonuses).
And another coach plays pro elves and after 7 matches, he did not suffer a single perm injury (even apo'd). Only BHs and 2 MNG.
(well, we're 10 coaches and others obviously don't get as much luck, but still).
So. FUMBBL RNG is not broken at all. It just simulates tabletop luck very well :)
Posted by vaclav on 2012-06-28 21:28:39
Homer Simpson: "What is the chance of geting a 1 on a D6... One in a million!"
Posted by RandomOracle on 2012-06-28 21:36:44
Don't let the door hit you on the ass on your way out!
Posted by blader4411 on 2012-06-28 21:41:39
Hey there RandomOracle, where have you been?
Posted by grendel2410 on 2012-06-28 21:53:26
"RNG is better than any dice in the real world"
This is all I wanted to hear....amazing.
They told me that people in fummbl think this way and I didnt want to believe it, but it's true!!!
A program's random is better than real random....I have no words to describe my feelings. Well, yes there are. I have almost die laughing.
Lets play fummbl or whatever....
Posted by dode74 on 2012-06-28 21:56:10
http://www.dakkadakka.com/wiki/en/That%27s_How_I_Roll_-_A_Scientific_Analysis_of_Dice
Posted by grendel2410 on 2012-06-28 21:57:12
And sorry, but fummbl RNG DOES NOT simulate tabletop luck very well. Not at all.
And It's not a problem for me, I repeat that.
It's just something I'm pointing out.
I'll ask in the next tournament around here (real world) if somebody has ever had a team with 10 matches played and 4 +AG. What do you thing they would tell me?...
Posted by the_Sage on 2012-06-28 21:59:41
I'm not sure I believe Woodstock either, but that's not the point.
I do think you (grendel) are wrong. If you take 100 coaches, I'm sure 5 of them will roll really absurdly good stats. He'll go: wow, that's so amazing, it can't be a coincidence! That's significantly better than chance (p=.05). He'll be right. He still won't prove a thing.
Posted by Niebling on 2012-06-28 22:04:52
Lol :)
Posted by the_Sage on 2012-06-28 22:12:50
+ST: 1/36: average
+MA: 3/36: below average
+AG: 2/36: quite above average.
So what you're saying is the RNG is specifically broken to produce 11s?
Posted by Emeric on 2012-06-28 22:14:30
(Re to : "And sorry, but fummbl RNG DOES NOT simulate tabletop luck very well. Not at all.")
Well. Wow. Ok then, you must be right.
Wow. How could i dare saying otherwise?
I'll get back to my supernatural tabletop league then.
But i'll know it's not real. I'll know that FUMBBL ROLLS OUR REAL DICE !!!
Posted by grendel2410 on 2012-06-29 16:04:57
No, en serio, cual es la probabilidad de que en tres equipos que tengo aqui y con los que juego, haya 2 guttes con +2AG?
No, really, which is the probability of having as I have here 3 teams with skill, and 2 guute runner with +2AG?