Posted by spelledaren on 2024-12-03 00:39:44
Ugh that looks ugly when I dont use the coding....
Posted by CrisisChris on 2024-12-03 08:49:11
Just for me to know. What was the reason to multiply here instead of a plain sum? While MartinSeptim will be leader in both rankings, the order in a sum will look very different. E.g., Elyod and Lautrehamon would swap palces and Tschirgant would drop from 5th down to 15th place while Malmir would be reported 6th place instead of 13th. Overall the sum would benefit those who participated in all four competitions so far (as long as you stick to the 50 points for not participating).
All I want to say there are quite a few parameters that influence this ranking and I would love to understand your thoughts better... If you like to explain.
But before this is misunderstood: Thanks for your effort and the explanations in the ranking. Allways nice to have something to read'. ;-)
Posted by spelledaren on 2024-12-03 09:41:39
Hey.
Well the multiplier makes the difference between being first and being knocked out in the first round much greater in the long run, and also penalises missing the tournament heavily. But dont think too much about it!
9+9+9+9 = 36 (6561)
1+3+17+17 = 38 (867)
A straight up addition would make the person who always won one game look better than the one who won the tournament once and made the semis too.
Posted by spelledaren on 2024-12-03 09:49:19
Three coaches who might enter the top 20 among the ones who look they might qualify for number 5 are Yudlugar, Beltroniko and proff70.
Posted by Carthage on 2024-12-03 14:28:06
Well, by putting Shook on this list you have guaranteed I'm going to try for the gauntlet more regularly now. Made it both times I had a qualifying team :)