Posted by blocknroll on 2017-10-01 10:28:47

Democracy sucks!

Posted by Harad on 2017-10-01 11:50:47

Sorry if this has been addressed elsewhere: why are additional races being considered whilst GW are actively releasing rules? Won't they soon clarify whether they are in or not themselves?

Posted by sann0638 on 2017-10-01 12:09:17

@block, if you could make that comment everywhere possible, that would be excellent.

@harad, this is kind of independent of GW, and connected to the massive online player base.

Posted by Verminardo on 2017-10-01 20:27:27

How many active online players are there on Cyanide?

Posted by Throweck on 2017-10-01 21:52:02

@Vermi - more than 7

Posted by sann0638 on 2017-10-02 07:58:48

500 daily concurrent users.

Posted by Badoek on 2017-10-02 08:09:16

Predictable outcome I guess. Well done though on doing it like this.

Posted by blocknroll on 2017-10-02 12:28:48

sann - i'll fire up twitter right away!

Posted by Harad on 2017-10-02 17:18:09

Thanks Sann. The key part of my question is why. I appreciate who this is being driven by. What I don't really get is this: if you'd said to me three years ago that this was a vote I would have understood, there was no sign of a rules lead from GW etc. and so I appreciate that people might want to push through a change. But with an active releasing of rules, particularly when we know there are more rules (and possibly races) to come, why would a group decide to push through changes? What happens if GW releases a khorne race and it's a bit different (this is a rhetorical question to illustrate the point). It has extremely little impact on me, I don't mind at all, it just seems a very strange thing to do.

Posted by sann0638 on 2017-10-02 21:23:50

It's not out of the blue, it has been on the agenda (literally) since BB1 released them, and we were having some work done on the database so could make it happen.