Posted by PainState on 2010-09-23 20:00:01
So revise the old 2ED league rules and apply them to the CRB.
Posted by pythrr on 2010-09-23 20:12:09
what painstate said *2
Posted by stej on 2010-09-23 20:24:31
2ED a bit before my time so couldnt comment on that. Link to 2ED rules available at all?
Posted by avien on 2010-09-24 13:52:00
Rule changes don't sit well with most guys here, since they imagine it would have to be for the whole site. However I agree things like these could be fun to try in a league =)
Posted by Wreckage on 2010-09-27 00:32:31
it's not so much the people... i think it's just the site policy... and the site policy is necessary to keep all the different opinions in check. Nobody is supposed to complain... If you suggest more freedom in league play I guess thats possible but needs christer to work on it...he has tons of stuff to programm so the question is if these things are really somewhat important....
As for league play:
Home team advantage... needs a client implementation... almost meaningless for the dynamics... what's the point really to put work into that?
Contracts: Yes they cost money, but normally it's also possible to sell them. Just because you don't get money for retireing them, things aren't improved by now requesting money.
MnG... how exactly should that be implemented?
Real Time injuries: Based on what kriteria?
INcreased roster size: I d like to see such an option... although i doubt it would add much to the game....
we definatly need an option to reduce the size of teams to allow sevens leagues and such a like....
Overall, those requests are nice ideas but I doubt they help constructuvly..