Posted by pythrr on 2013-06-29 03:14:27
" When faced with a team that has been reduced to two players, down 0-1 on turn 17, what does studman do? Piles on with the ball carrier, of course! When he can pick up the ball with aesthetic wolf, does he do it? No! He blitzes every time!"
---
I like studman.
But this could be viewed by the admins as "not playing competitively. So, if true (and I have not idea if it is), he could get his team retired for this.
Just saying.
Posted by ThePeoplesChamp on 2013-06-29 03:36:15
rated 6 for being hella rowdy. *fist pump*
Posted by Araznaroth on 2013-06-29 03:39:22
I have never had thenpleasure of playing him. Speccing tho yes! Always seemed to miss his team. After awhile I got deterred from the minmaxing aspect, plus its hard playing Studmanstyle! Really have to force myself to do it. :D
Posted by wintergreen13 on 2013-06-29 03:59:23
@pythrr: I guess it gets a bit murky when trying to determine if a certain playstyle is considered competitive play. But I would argue that he tried to win even though he always put the bloodshed part first. The ballcarrier piling on was to try to injure a minmaxed clawpombing Marauder, and there were always zombies to pick up the ball when aesthetic dog decided not to, right ;)
@araznaroth: I totally agree! I am not good at minmaxing either, especially because it requires the retirement of healthy players, which I refuse to do (except in the case of trying to revitalize teams that need pruning, which I've had to do to keep teams around from back when I didn't understand TV management). Playing studman style is tough - and best suited to someone who's following his own muse.
Posted by Overhamsteren on 2013-06-29 04:35:39
"I’ve never once seen studman complain about dice"
Isn't his chat just a recorder playing the same 3 sentences over and over again?
Posted by wintergreen13 on 2013-06-29 04:40:01
@overhamsteren: well, kinda sorta :) He has some stock phrases, but there's definitely wit there, too. He's definitely the master of the humorous understatement, especially when things are going bad for him.
Posted by keggiemckill on 2013-06-29 05:27:43
I watched that game with Winter, and 10 others when Studman picked up the ball, blitzed a CPomber . After he knocked himover he debated for 2 min whether to pile on, and everyone /stomp'ed. He tied the game, but could have won.
@Pythrr, if you want to guess which team he did this too, you recently lost 0-3 trying to do a similar thing. :)
I enjoyed watching Studman and his crazy all mens line of scrimmage. The difference for his min/maxing was that he never put winning first, and most likely lost his games.
Posted by harvestmouse on 2013-06-29 09:24:19
There's no defence for minmaxing in box. If it's a theme and you're playing willing opponents who know what they are getting into, then that's fine. However in box you aren't.
Kudos to Studman though. He's worked hard on polishing his online persona, until he's got a whole bunch of you 'bro-ing' and 'buff-ing' your way through games.
Posted by koadah on 2013-06-29 09:38:21
The rules are the rules. If it was really such a big deal we'd change the rules.
These are supposed to be 'competitive' divisions but there is no recognised goal to compete for. So people create their own goals.
This is the same old story of different people wanting to play different ways but all doing it in the same divisions.
People can moan about belly putters all they like. But people will use them unless there is a rule in place to prevent them.
Same with CPOMBers, min/max, blodge spam, cherry picking, elf balling etc, etc.
So. We can moan if it makes us feel better. But, it's all in the game y'all.
Posted by JimmyFantastic on 2013-06-29 12:35:54
infinite/6 Studman is the number one thing about fumbbl!
Griefers vs Clinically Important was the most enjoyable game I have ever had.
People who whine about Studman need to lighten up and enjoy playing this little kids game in the spirit it was intended and have some freaking FUN!!!!
Posted by Loew on 2013-06-29 13:49:52
just to offer a minority opinion:
not everyone finds studman's special brand of testosterone and cheap booze amusing
besides, he could get pretty insulting if you weren't a fanboi
cudos though for never breaking character...at least I hope it's just an online persona
Posted by ThePeoplesChamp on 2013-06-29 14:19:23
If people don't like him that's fine, but you need the entertainers like him to brighten this up! Way too many hum drum haters. Shirt copter by yourself in your room in front of a mirror, I guarantee you will feel better.
Posted by blocknroll on 2013-06-29 15:11:26
no one has said natty light yet. Worth mentioning I thought.
Posted by Nightbird on 2013-06-29 16:32:44
In response to Studman, & later after being discovered he was also dudebro, Studmandudebro has on occasion, in main chat, broken his online persona to reveal a quite seemingly very intelligent 'real' persona. One could even surmise, after witnessing these breaks, that he doesn't even drink natty light at all or even wave his shirt round like a helicopter. I've personally always thought that this was both an escape, as we all need at times, from the 'real' world & a sort of experiment for him. As the tootsie pop owl said: "The world may never know". I do, however, find him to be amusing, but at times annoying as well.
Posted by PaddyMick on 2013-06-29 18:57:31
I get it now
Good blog
Posted by wintergreen13 on 2013-06-29 20:20:31
+1 to all Wire quotes and references (thank you, Koadah!)
Posted by wintergreen13 on 2013-06-29 20:26:43
Also, I am not defending minmaxing, merely defending studman. The whole reason for the blog was that I think a lot of people unfairly lump him in with coaches who are more intentional about taking advantage via their choices, whereas I think his teams, goals, and play style are coming from a completely different place. If I could boil it all down to one thing, it would be that I always looked forward to playing him when we got matched up, which to me is one of the highest compliments one can pay another coach.
Posted by licker on 2013-06-29 21:52:33
I have no problem with the way he plays, but I do find the persona to be rather tired and boring honestly.
different strokes...
Posted by gjopie on 2013-06-30 01:04:31
I'm on side with harvestmouse. I'm not with the jimmyfantastic, peopleschamp, fanbois (oops, name dropping). Mainly because I just don't find it funny. Fair enough if you do. It takes all sorts, I guess. But anyone who claims its a kind of "wit" doesn't know what "wit" is.
And I'm convinced all this stuff is a real coach's secret second team.
Posted by ThePeoplesChamp on 2013-06-30 02:35:12
Well you can't play with our toys then. So there.
Posted by xnoelx on 2013-06-30 06:44:53
My favourite blog ever is still studman's blog about nigglers, and how not playing with them is racist. That (to me) is proof that he's smarter than his persona...
Posted by JimmyFantastic on 2013-06-30 23:39:05
but morarly?!?
Posted by keggiemckill on 2013-07-01 22:17:01
https://fumbbl.com/FUMBBL.php?page=match&op=view&id=3400864
This game was awesome. 2 Legends die at the hand of aesthetic dog. I wish we could see it with their typing also. It was a classic.
Posted by the_Sage on 2013-07-01 22:21:46
gjopie:"And I'm convinced all this stuff is a real coach's secret second team."
I deny it vehemently!