Posted by paradocks on 2017-03-31 00:08:09

<-- proudly using Big Guys on FUMBBL since 2504

Posted by licker on 2017-03-31 00:12:52

No PO makes BGs that much worse.

Wizard seems irrelevant unless you mean inducing more BGs (or star BGs) since you don't have the obvious 150k sink.

Posted by Dominik on 2017-03-31 01:22:44

I mean you can afford Big Guys for +100k costs, as the inducments for your opponent ain't that good anymore in that height.
And that Cpomb doesn't erase your Big Guys off the pitch so quick anymore.

Posted by Lorebass on 2017-03-31 01:53:05

You can start using merc big guys now instead of wizards!

Posted by Dominik on 2017-03-31 02:35:34

I did so with Deathrollers. Combine with Guard and a Bribe and you have a Strength 7 Stand Firm Break Tackle Big Guy for 350k for 13,33 turns. Compare with Morg at costs of 430k.
For 450k you could even go into Overtime with Deathroller if necessary.

Posted by Stimme on 2017-03-31 06:42:49

I was wondering if the 3-player MVP system actually will lead to more Big Guys on the pitch, as they become easier to skill.

Posted by Medon on 2017-03-31 10:44:59

Why big guys need skills?

Posted by Dominik on 2017-03-31 11:10:12

Guard and Stand Firm for sure.

Posted by delusional on 2017-04-01 01:41:43

"Guard and Stand Firm for sure".... I never understand why Break tackle is underrated in this respect. I find that being able to move a big guy to assist in a tackle can be very very useful. Ok I used to play a lot of lizards and had a Kroxigor with Shadowing (and side step!)

Posted by Dominik on 2017-04-01 11:12:24

Its choice #3, although not on all Big Guys.

Posted by mike467 on 2017-04-01 16:21:24

Delusional, I don't think Bt is underated it's just with loner it's risky. Not so with guard and SF. More big guys can only be a good thing!