9 coaches online • Server time: 04:14
* * * Did you know? The best interceptor is Leena with 22 interceptions.
Recent Forum Topics  12-game Season | Please vote for our ... | No seasons! Open Pla... |
2011-07-22 21:44:35
36 votes, rating 3.7
36 votes, rating 3.7
We are no longer allowed to discuss tactics in the forums?
I sincerely hope this is not a new FUMBBL policy and that we just have some overzealous admins.
Comments
Posted by koadah on 2011-07-22 22:10:59
No this is an old FUMBBL policy
Posted by jimimothybodles on 2011-07-22 22:13:22
Fight the power!
Posted by EvolveToAnarchism on 2011-07-22 22:29:33
From the rules page:
"Personal attacks and excessive abusive language is not accepted. Discussing other people's styles of play does not qualify as personal attacks."
"Personal attacks and excessive abusive language is not accepted. Discussing other people's styles of play does not qualify as personal attacks."
Posted by Kinks on 2011-07-22 22:45:55
Why have people down rated this blog?
Posted by Aries on 2011-07-22 22:46:44
i guess it depends whether your discussion of their style is a personal attack. "He plays like crap" is an attack. "He makes poor decisions about where to leave his guys so that I get easy 2dbs and blitzes on his ball carrier." shows that he plays like crap, yet isnt an attack.
Posted by EvolveToAnarchism on 2011-07-22 23:15:59
It actually was in reference to discussing tactics in general. Some arguably, overzealous admin locked a perfectly fruitful discussion of anti-ClawPOMB tactics. And proceed to toss another tactics thread straight down the Memory Hole.
Long live FUMSOC!
Long live FUMSOC!
Posted by SillySod on 2011-07-23 00:26:40
This is not a new policy. Sadly.
Posted by spiro on 2011-07-24 20:03:27
Kinks, do you know why they rated it down ?
Because each person who is criticizing fumbbl is not comfortable. It's a simple mechanism, mutual admiration society, that's all.
So, if you don't agree with the people here, don't tell them that because you will be a troll.
Flattering is better here.
Because each person who is criticizing fumbbl is not comfortable. It's a simple mechanism, mutual admiration society, that's all.
So, if you don't agree with the people here, don't tell them that because you will be a troll.
Flattering is better here.
Posted by paulhicks on 2011-07-25 03:52:11
no spiro. sometimes people just take a different side to the one others take. and you moaning about being called a troll is a but rich after you acused colin (!?!?) and indeed all other fumbbl coaches of being troll but refused to provide any evidence.
Thoughout your "posting history" you have developed a well estabished precident of resusing to read any other opinions that diverge from yours, attacking coaches who don't agee with you (paranoia ftw) and constantly playing the victim despite your continually rude posting style. Don't get me wrong spiro. I love ya. Debating you is like playing a game on easy mode that you can still never win as the end boss has the "single minded egomaniac" special ability.
I voted low on Evo's blog for a number of reasons which i have discussed with him personaly. You just see it as another opportunity to forward your personal and tight locked opinion that they're "all out to get you".
BTW i notice you have raised the topic of trolling a lot more since you were banned for trolling yourself.
Thoughout your "posting history" you have developed a well estabished precident of resusing to read any other opinions that diverge from yours, attacking coaches who don't agee with you (paranoia ftw) and constantly playing the victim despite your continually rude posting style. Don't get me wrong spiro. I love ya. Debating you is like playing a game on easy mode that you can still never win as the end boss has the "single minded egomaniac" special ability.
I voted low on Evo's blog for a number of reasons which i have discussed with him personaly. You just see it as another opportunity to forward your personal and tight locked opinion that they're "all out to get you".
BTW i notice you have raised the topic of trolling a lot more since you were banned for trolling yourself.
Posted by spiro on 2011-07-31 15:00:31
bwahahaha paulhicks, you are very "objective", one person can take a different side, another person is called a troll LOL, no comment.
About Colin, i did not accuse him, i was writing about his dialogue with Lizvis. If you like Colin it's your business not my, i don't must be as you.
I think you do not see, that you have the same style as me, but you do not criticizing. You are a person from second barricade pffft.
BTw each person have own paranoia, You too.
About Colin, i did not accuse him, i was writing about his dialogue with Lizvis. If you like Colin it's your business not my, i don't must be as you.
I think you do not see, that you have the same style as me, but you do not criticizing. You are a person from second barricade pffft.
BTw each person have own paranoia, You too.
Posted by paulhicks on 2011-08-02 20:19:46
oh i apologise spiro. i mistook your comment "Colin for me you are just a troll" as being you calling Colin a troll. Must be one of those language barrier things i guess.
And yeah i'd say i am pretty objective most of the time including when people are arguing from a different point of view. I seem to remember going to great lengths during one forum discussion with you to try to reach resolution and overcome the language barriers and only gave up when you stated that you were refusing to read any comments from people who were patently trying to explain their opposing opinions to you.
As for your last paragraph i'd love to know how you think i have the same style as you? Also feel free to post your profesional diagnosis on my paranioa.
And yeah i'd say i am pretty objective most of the time including when people are arguing from a different point of view. I seem to remember going to great lengths during one forum discussion with you to try to reach resolution and overcome the language barriers and only gave up when you stated that you were refusing to read any comments from people who were patently trying to explain their opposing opinions to you.
As for your last paragraph i'd love to know how you think i have the same style as you? Also feel free to post your profesional diagnosis on my paranioa.