20 coaches online • Server time: 07:24
* * * Did you know? The best passer is Cherrystone Hotpack with 656 completions.
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post Replays - Fumbbl Cupgoto Post BB2016 Ranked, Leagu...goto Post Fumbbl Cup - Are you...
Chainsaw
Last seen 40 weeks ago
Overall
Rookie
Overall
CR
1250
Record
0/0/0
Win Percentage
n/a
Archive

2019

2019-02-26 17:59:58
rating 3.3
2019-02-21 15:32:58
rating 5.6

2018

2018-11-29 23:02:01
rating 5.5

2017

2017-02-08 23:56:40
rating 5.8
2017-02-01 13:18:54
rating 1.8
2017-01-04 00:57:54
rating 4.2
2017-01-01 01:53:20
rating 3.2

2016

2016-12-27 23:05:58
rating 4.8
2016-12-15 23:20:51
rating 5.2
2016-12-08 23:39:28
rating 4.5
2016-11-23 19:36:09
rating 4.4
2016-11-18 22:43:34
rating 5.3
2016-11-08 23:15:35
rating 2.2
2016-10-27 02:00:04
rating 4.5
2016-02-22 11:44:26
rating 4.1
2016-02-08 21:54:52
rating 3.5
2016-02-07 16:37:13
rating 4.3
2016-01-15 13:15:04
rating 5.4
2016-01-12 15:56:00
rating 3
2016-01-07 01:57:43
rating 5.5
2016-01-06 13:07:10
rating 3.3

2015

2015-12-20 02:49:16
rating 4.2
2015-12-16 23:29:23
rating 4.6
2015-01-01 14:00:53
rating 5.5

2014

2014-11-16 00:43:36
rating 2.9
2014-11-14 00:14:39
rating 4.2
2014-11-12 14:29:16
rating 4.1
2014-11-12 09:37:19
rating 3.9
2014-10-29 23:50:22
rating 4.1
2014-10-09 16:50:52
rating 3.2
2014-09-16 19:19:34
rating 2.3
2014-09-12 23:50:12
rating 4.2
2014-09-04 22:58:50
rating 2.9
2014-09-01 09:16:07
rating 3.1
2014-08-18 18:54:36
rating 2.1
2014-08-12 11:04:37
rating 4.7
2014-08-10 23:06:02
rating 2.3
2014-08-04 16:05:26
rating 2.2
2014-07-11 12:21:32
rating 2.2
2014-05-25 04:14:45
rating 2
2014-04-24 12:37:46
rating 3.7
2014-04-18 02:35:09
rating 2.2
2014-04-11 03:18:43
rating 2.2
2014-04-04 12:33:57
rating 4.2
2014-03-18 01:07:52
rating 4.6
2014-03-12 22:39:29
rating 5
2014-03-07 03:22:34
rating 4.6
2014-03-05 04:16:47
rating 1.9
2014-02-19 14:21:10
rating 4
2014-02-07 16:00:28
rating 3.7
2014-01-30 17:11:36
rating 3.5
2014-01-04 19:11:30
rating 3.2

2013

2013-11-16 23:09:58
rating 4.4
2013-11-16 13:51:11
rating 4
2013-10-29 23:37:45
rating 4.7
2013-10-17 17:09:12
rating 5.2
2013-10-16 12:18:28
rating 5.5
2013-10-15 14:12:17
rating 5.8
2013-10-14 13:21:53
rating 5.8
2013-10-14 02:22:13
rating 5.2
2013-10-13 13:16:39
rating 5.8
2013-10-12 13:57:42
rating 5.8
2013-10-11 16:46:43
rating 5.7
2013-10-11 00:08:12
rating 5.6
2013-10-10 08:59:00
rating 5.6
2013-10-06 23:16:04
rating 3.3
2013-10-05 18:27:21
rating 2.8
2013-10-02 03:30:13
rating 3.3
2013-09-27 01:33:10
rating 3.4
2013-08-31 22:26:39
rating 4.8
2013-08-10 13:30:00
rating 2.8
2013-08-03 20:27:22
rating 3.5
2013-07-18 00:53:15
rating 4.3
2013-06-20 18:02:30
rating 3.4
2013-06-19 00:50:04
rating 3.2
2013-06-13 19:07:27
rating 3.7
2013-06-05 18:09:23
rating 3.6
2013-05-29 18:10:49
rating 3
2013-05-24 20:10:57
rating 4
2013-05-19 18:14:51
rating 3.3
2013-05-14 00:32:52
rating 3.1
2013-05-08 19:04:10
rating 3.1
2013-05-03 03:35:01
rating 2.8
2013-04-16 12:24:36
rating 3.5
2013-04-13 02:11:33
rating 3.2
2013-04-10 17:24:50
rating 5.4
2013-03-30 23:25:48
rating 2.4
2013-03-27 18:43:36
rating 4.2
2013-03-25 18:02:09
rating 4.1
2013-03-21 17:32:44
rating 3.8
2013-03-16 20:57:42
rating 4.8
2013-03-16 01:45:54
rating 4.7
2013-03-12 19:01:40
rating 3.9
2013-03-07 19:35:18
rating 4.8
2013-03-06 03:23:13
rating 4.9
2013-03-05 00:24:07
rating 2.8
2013-02-28 16:02:38
rating 4.9
2013-02-20 19:06:14
rating 4.4
2013-02-19 19:45:09
rating 2.2
2013-02-08 23:11:32
rating 3.2
2013-01-24 14:59:06
rating 5.5
2013-01-17 14:38:22
rating 2.8
2013-01-14 16:56:23
rating 4.5
2013-01-10 20:44:26
rating 4.2
2013-01-08 02:57:37
rating 2.8
2013-01-05 20:45:27
rating 4.5

2012

2012-12-24 00:03:01
rating 5.4
2012-12-12 14:48:33
rating 5.1
2012-12-11 10:48:08
rating 5.7
2012-12-10 20:45:15
rating 3.2
2012-12-07 18:36:10
rating 3.1
2012-12-07 13:43:04
rating 2.4
2012-12-04 01:23:14
rating 5.6
2012-11-30 18:54:59
rating 3.3
2012-11-23 15:18:06
rating 3.6
2012-11-21 06:24:24
rating 3.3
2012-11-17 03:30:33
rating 4.1
2012-11-13 08:59:56
rating 2.8
2012-11-12 09:31:26
rating 4.6
2012-11-09 11:48:51
rating 4.3
2012-11-08 22:07:31
rating 5.3
2012-11-07 11:12:00
rating 3.3
2012-10-26 14:43:46
rating 5.2
2012-06-10 22:01:15
rating 3.4
2012-06-06 01:21:42
rating 2.6
2012-06-02 22:19:38
rating 2.3
2012-05-28 02:23:34
rating 4
2012-05-25 02:04:53
rating 4.7
2012-04-25 01:15:04
rating 4
2012-04-19 05:13:24
rating 4.6
2012-04-13 15:04:35
rating 3.4
2012-04-09 14:55:12
rating 4.5
2012-04-04 11:13:43
rating 3.6
2012-04-02 09:39:59
rating 4.9
2012-03-29 03:32:44
rating 4.3
2012-03-22 10:23:31
rating 5.4
2012-03-16 17:36:03
rating 5.5

2008

2008-05-18 00:45:03
rating 3.9
2008-04-10 21:12:20
rating 3.4
2013-04-10 17:24:50
28 votes, rating 5.4
Do you need a SMACK!?!
The number of applications for recent SMACK draws has been poor. In fact, I don't think I've been scheduled for 3 weeks now.

So... what are you waiting for?

You've got at least 1 guaranteed game! No finder interaction required.

You could win a title! It'll be on your profile and make you look amazing.

What better game for your pixels to die in outside of a Major/Minor? Why lose great players in random ranked games when you could sacrifice them at the altar of SMACK!

Drink the blood and whine of your opponents as they wilt under the pressure of a tournament.

APPLY NOW! Apply a team for each category!
(<1250,1251-1500,1501-1750,1751-2000,LEGEND!)
Rate this entry
Comments
Posted by Cloggy on 2013-04-10 17:34:35
What kind of idiot would give a tourney promotion a 1 rating? :)
Posted by Chainsaw on 2013-04-10 17:41:11
Player haters, Cloggy.
Posted by koadah on 2013-04-10 17:45:01
If no one rates you 1 then you must be far too much of a nice guy :twisted:

On topic, all those TW limits seem far too LRB4. Brawl style seems to give you a better chance of getting a game without having to guess which category is going to be most popular.
Posted by Nelphine on 2013-04-10 17:48:03
yup, every single one of the teams i'm interested inp laying is qualified as legend, because it's based on weight.

and legend teams are usually cpomb. so.

no interest whatsoever from me.
Posted by jamesfarrell129 on 2013-04-10 17:49:29
I don't really have time to commit to these at the moment.

But your blog post inspired me, so I signed up a team anyway.
Posted by maysrill on 2013-04-10 17:51:41
@Nelphine - I've looked at the lineups for the Legend SMACKs. There's usually one or two, but you see a lot of high-TV elves and Khemri and such as well. You also seem to get the occasional TW-bloated TV1800-ish team.

I keep meaning to get into more SMACKs, but lately it seems like my free time has been lining up well with the majors, and this week it's WoC for me.
Posted by vaclav on 2013-04-10 18:13:34
2 weeks i dont enter teams, and this is what happens...
Posted by vaclav on 2013-04-10 18:17:14
@Nelphine - More glory for you, if you win a legend smack with a no clawpomb team.
Posted by Mr_Foulscumm on 2013-04-10 20:07:07
I want to smack with my Goblins. But at a Tourney weight of 2000+ I don't see that happening.

Why are we using TW again? :/
Posted by koadah on 2013-04-10 20:40:38
I like TW at at the low end. I dump it after 1600 though.
Posted by Rabe on 2013-04-10 20:41:53
Well, I applied to the WoC and two tournaments would be too much. Soon I'll have more time again (or more control about its usage) and then I might enter my Monsters again. I don't see them playing anything BUT Legend SMACKs any time soon. ;-)
Posted by Synn on 2013-04-10 22:44:45
Tourney weight needs to go.

LRB thinking in a CRP world.

__Synn
Posted by fly on 2013-04-10 23:22:39
what about changing into two categories:
close tv and random tv.
TW makes my teams all be kinda the same smack bracket.
Posted by Chainsaw on 2013-04-11 00:28:40
Come on guys, of course TW is necessary.

"Oh I'll just enter my team with a few MNG players and a million in cash, only 1500TV."

2nd round 2200TV. Yeah, that's fair... not.
Posted by hale on 2013-04-11 05:03:26
like i said on my honeymoon.... listen to the man with the chainsaw
Posted by harvestmouse on 2013-04-11 07:53:53
I agree with Chainsaw on the TW issue. The TW has no place in a CRP world argument, roughly translates as 'it's inhibiting gaming the system'

The problem is, why teams have that much money in the first place. Has to stay imo also.
Posted by koadah on 2013-04-11 10:48:50
The argument was Smacks had not been starting so people were suggesting how to help get some going.

Not an issue now it seems that two started. All you need is a good argument. ;)

But still, if you have 7 teams at 2000+ and 7 at -2000 you have no tournament even though I am sure that some of those -2000 teams would have been prepared to take their chances with the big boys.

I'd also say that the money is a benefit as it means your team will be back in business quicker after taking it's likely beating. ;)
Posted by Kam on 2013-04-11 12:01:52
TW is the reason I love Smacks. With flings, the odds are much better with a lot of inducements. :P