2023
2022
2020
2017
2016
2015
2014
2014-03-28 16:00:17
rating 3.1
7 coaches online • Server time: 05:05
* * * Did you know? The most valuable player is Thursdaynight Guitarclub with 96 MVPs.
Recent Forum Topics  In-Season team build... | Smurf/Goblin/Halflin... | Increasing the max R... |
2010-01-13 17:52:07
28 votes, rating 3.7
28 votes, rating 3.7
Stat stuff and the RNG
Well the Buccaneers hit 400 skill rolls last night. I keep track of my stats so I was just wondering what the break down was. Just seeing how it breaks down over the long haul when it comes to the RNG.
total skill rolls: 400
Normal Skills: 289 72.25%
DOubles: 64 16% average should be around: 67
+ST: 12 3% Average should be around: 11
+Ag: 25 6.25% Average should be around: 22
+MV: 10 2.5% MV is a problem due to not taking the +MV for other skills.
Age fails: 31
6+ 2
16+ 4
31+ 11
51+ 9
76+ 3
126+ 1
176+ 1
Did not track the # of each of these rolls for a % breakdown. But just looking at the numbers I feel like Iam a little under the average for age fails.
Overall the Bucs basically fall right on the averages with a slight +/- in some of the catagories...
SO I quess over time the RNG will give you the normal curve of rolls.
total skill rolls: 400
Normal Skills: 289 72.25%
DOubles: 64 16% average should be around: 67
+ST: 12 3% Average should be around: 11
+Ag: 25 6.25% Average should be around: 22
+MV: 10 2.5% MV is a problem due to not taking the +MV for other skills.
Age fails: 31
6+ 2
16+ 4
31+ 11
51+ 9
76+ 3
126+ 1
176+ 1
Did not track the # of each of these rolls for a % breakdown. But just looking at the numbers I feel like Iam a little under the average for age fails.
Overall the Bucs basically fall right on the averages with a slight +/- in some of the catagories...
SO I quess over time the RNG will give you the normal curve of rolls.
Comments
Posted by Zombie69 on 2010-01-13 18:00:27
"SO I quess over time the RNG will give you the normal curve of rolls."
Not necessarily. Here are the results for my wood elves (expected results in parentheses):
Total : 232
Normal : 187 = 80.6% (72.2%)
Double : 22 = 9.5% (13.9%)
MA : 4 = 1.7% (5.6%)
ST : 1 = 0.4% (2.8%)
AG : 18 = 7.8% (5.6%)
As you can see, AG is above average, but everything else is way below average, and my team has been getting way too many normal skills.
On top of that, the only +ST came on a dauntless catcher!
Not necessarily. Here are the results for my wood elves (expected results in parentheses):
Total : 232
Normal : 187 = 80.6% (72.2%)
Double : 22 = 9.5% (13.9%)
MA : 4 = 1.7% (5.6%)
ST : 1 = 0.4% (2.8%)
AG : 18 = 7.8% (5.6%)
As you can see, AG is above average, but everything else is way below average, and my team has been getting way too many normal skills.
On top of that, the only +ST came on a dauntless catcher!
Posted by Mr_Foulscumm on 2010-01-13 21:55:14
Zombie, your team has been getting average rolls.
Posted by Zombie69 on 2010-01-13 23:48:56
That's not average. All you have to do is compare the percentages with their average counterparts in parentheses to see that they're indeed quite below average.
PainState got average numbers, not us!
PainState got average numbers, not us!
Posted by AoP-Vimes on 2010-01-14 07:13:37
Here for the aging stats:
SPPs Title SP Rolls Ageing Probability Cumulated
0-5 Rookie None None None None
6-15 Experienced One 3+ 97.2% 97.2%
16-30 Veteran Two 4+ 91.7% 89.1%
31-50 Emerging Star Three 5+ 83.3% 74.3%
51-75 Star Player Four 6+ 72.2% 53.6%
76-125 Super-Star Five 7+ 58.3% 31.3%
126-175 Mega-Star Six 8+ 41.7% 13.0%
176+ Legend Seven 9+ 27.8% 3.6%
Mebbe you can track em down ;) harhar
SPPs Title SP Rolls Ageing Probability Cumulated
0-5 Rookie None None None None
6-15 Experienced One 3+ 97.2% 97.2%
16-30 Veteran Two 4+ 91.7% 89.1%
31-50 Emerging Star Three 5+ 83.3% 74.3%
51-75 Star Player Four 6+ 72.2% 53.6%
76-125 Super-Star Five 7+ 58.3% 31.3%
126-175 Mega-Star Six 8+ 41.7% 13.0%
176+ Legend Seven 9+ 27.8% 3.6%
Mebbe you can track em down ;) harhar
Posted by Mr_Foulscumm on 2010-01-14 21:16:12
Zombie, you're normal rolls are above average.
See what I'm saying?
See what I'm saying?